The Other in the Mirror: Jewish Interpretations of Christian and Islamic Origins

The Jewish experience in Germany has been variously described as a “mutual fructification,” by Michael Meyer, and as an “unrequited love,” by Gershom Scholem. Jewish historians were frequently the canaries in the mineshaft, forging the cultural climate for German Jews. The Wissenschaft des Judentums displays something of each characterization, and comparing two major figures, Abraham Geiger and Heinrich Graetz, sheds light on the relationship between Jewish historiography and the larger German community of historians.

Geiger and Graetz were two controversial figures who wrote negative reviews of each other’s work and were given very different receptions by Jews in their day and by scholars in subsequent generations. Both Graetz and Geiger were pioneering scholars, yet they differed significantly in their philological methods, their religious commitments, and their broader concerns as historians. Graetz wrote a narrative of Jewish experience from biblical times to the present that reflects the imperialist culture of Europe of his day and that also provided a sense of national pride among Jews. Geiger applied philological methods to texts in order to illuminate the centrality of Judaism to particular historical moments, upending scholarly consensus.

Reserve tickets here.

From the Leo Baeck Institute